Although NA tend to provide lower variability than BA [7-10], how laboratories perform NA varies almost as much as how laboratories perform BA; thus, variability still remains high. The percentage of falsely positive and falsely negative results in FVIII-inhibitor-negative samples is also unacceptably high (up to 32% for false positives; up to 5% for false negatives) [7-10]. To improve reproducibility, ECAT performed a quality improvement cycle including these steps: (i) an external survey among
51 laboratories that participated on a regular basis in the ECAT FVIII-inhibitor programme; (ii) selection from these of 15 representative laboratories for a centralized
workshop; (iii) during the workshop, a zero ITF2357 ic50 point measurement using participants’ own methods and reagents and (iv) separate measurements with a fully standardized and universal method Forskolin (NA) and reagents; (v) an external survey among 13 workshop participants 3 months after the initial workshop and (vi) an external survey among 22 of the original 51 laboratories with standardized methods (BNPP with FVIII activity ranging from 0.95 to 1.05 IU mL−1, FVIII-deficient plasma as reference sample, standardized sample dilution with FVIII-deficient plasma). In each step of the cycle, an identical set of seven samples was used (one negative and six positive). The means and CVs of results using the six inhibitor-positive samples at the various steps (Table 1) clearly show that very low inter-laboratory variations can be achieved using a centralized setting with uniform methods and reagents (step 4), and acceptable inter-laboratory variations are possible in EQA surveys by significant standardization of the methods (step 6). The inhibitor activity of the negative sample was also below the cut-off value in all participants
Resminostat bar one in steps 4 and 6. Additional pitfalls as well as strategies for improvements in this area of testing are extensively covered in a recent review [10]. In brief, pitfalls occur at any stage of the diagnostic process, including pre-analytical issues (doctors test request, sample collection), analytical (methodology as detailed above), and post-analytical (laboratory interpretation and reporting, doctors’ interpretation and action). Main strategies comprise: (a) pre-analytical: (i) check test orders for accuracy and relevance (to ensure performance of the correct tests); (ii) check and be aware of blood sampling issues (correct anticoagulant, proper fill, etc.