Briefly, 20 μL of each sample was added to 5 μL reducing SDS PAGE

Briefly, 20 μL of each sample was added to 5 μL reducing SDS PAGE sample buffer (Pierce, UK) and boiled for 5 minutes to denature the protein. Samples were then analysed by SDS PAGE using a 5% stacking gel and 15% resolving gel. After electrophoresis, gels were placed in a fixative solution (40% methanol, 15% acetic acid) and then stained with Brilliant Blue G (Sigma, UK). V8 protease samples were incubated on ice with 100 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride for 30 minutes prior to SDS PAGE in order to minimise self-digestion. The expected molecular masses of the V8 protease and α-haemolysin were given as 29 kDa and 33 kDa respectively, as specified

by the manufacturer. Statistical analysis Data are expressed as means ± standard error. The results of the azocasein hydrolysis assay and sphingomyelinase assay were analysed using www.selleckchem.com/products/Thiazovivin.html the univariate ANOVA test with Bonferroni ARRY-438162 mouse analysis. The results from the lethal photosensitisation of EMRSA-16 were analysed using the Mann Whitney U test. For both statistical analyses, a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For photosensitiser dose experiments, the P values refer to samples in the absence of light versus irradiated samples. For light dose experiments, the P values refer to samples in the absence of methylene blue

versus samples irradiated in the 4EGI-1 order presence of methylene blue. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Ondine Biopharma Inc. for funding this work. References 1. Alekshun MN, Levy SB: Commensals upon us. Biochem Pharmacol 2006,71(7):893–900.CrossRefPubMed 2. Gould IM: The clinical

significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2005,61(4):277–282.CrossRefPubMed 3. Casey AL, Lambert PA, Elliott TSJ: Staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007,29(Supplement 3):S23-S32.CrossRefPubMed 4. Health Celecoxib Protection Agency: Surveillance of healthcare associated infections report: 2008. London: Health Protection Agency 2008. 5. Lowy FD:Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 1998,339(8):520–532.CrossRefPubMed 6. Elston DM: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007,56(1):1–16.CrossRefPubMed 7. Foster TJ: The Staphylococcus aureus “”superbug”". J Clin Invest 2004,114(12):1693–1696.PubMed 8. Gould IM: Costs of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its control. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006,28(5):379–384.CrossRefPubMed 9. Arvidson S, Tegmark K: Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 2001,291(2):159–170.CrossRefPubMed 10. Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM: Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000,13(1):16–34.CrossRefPubMed 11.

Comments are closed.