1.2). In the present study, we tested response alignment as the simplest of these predictions. In future work, we aim to examine the effects of physiological parameters. By using these as proxies for ‘subjective significance’ and, thereby, as parametric predictors for late positivity responses, we aim to take the first step towards a more formalised and operationalisable definition of subjective significance of linguistic stimuli and the mechanisms involved

in processing them. Furthermore, while we Dolutegravir cell line have focused particularly on the neurophysiological aspects of reorientation as resulting from NE release in this initial investigation, it is clear that future work will need to spell out in more detail how cognitive reorientation translates into language processing mechanisms. Sara and Bouret (2012) describe the reorientation process as analogous to the “truncated conditioned reflex” (Kupalov, 1961), a conditioned reflex which manifests itself in changes in the functional states of the brain rather than in external behaviour. Essentially, this change can be viewed as an “increase in cortical arousal, attention, and expectancy” IOX1 (Sara & Bouret, 2012, p.133). It facilitates memory retrieval

as well as perceptual shifts when viewing ambiguous stimuli such as the Necker cube and may serve a resetting function to allow for changes to the focus of attention. As these functional properties help the organism to deal with unexpected input, e.g. by allowing for shifts of attention to the unexpected input item, this provides an interesting potential link to the cognitive assumptions of the Monitoring Theory (cf. crotamiton van de Meerendonk, Rueschemeyer, & Kolk, 2013): the P3 as a marker of a shift of attention (see also Section 1.3), resulting from the saliency of an item,

for example due to its unexpectedness, but also e.g. to emotional or degraded items, or expected, behaviourally critical events. Clearly, an important objective for future research is to investigate in detail the relation between these relatively general cognitive correlates of reorienting and mechanistic accounts of language processing. As already discussed above, we believe that situations involving expected, but subjectively significant stimuli in particular may help to provide important new insights on the precise mechanisms by which cortical reorientation induced by NE release relates to language processing. In summary, we argue that, to explain the distribution of late positivities related to linguistic processing, nothing needs to be stipulated beyond the established understanding of the P3. Items that are particularly ill-fitting can be expected to disrupt analysis and evoke a positivity as a result of their high salience, as do items that belong to the category of task-critical events.