The influence of baseline bone turnover level on the https://www.selleckchem.com/small-molecule-compound-libraries.html efficacy of anti-osteoporotic drugs on fracture risk has been less widely studied than BMD, and the results have been less consistent. In an analysis of a subgroup of

1,593 patients from three randomised trials of risedronate [11], vertebral anti-fracture efficacy was compared in women with baseline bone turnover levels, assessed by urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline, above and below the normative median. At 3 years, the relative risk of vertebral fracture in patients with high bone turnover was 0.52, similar to that in patients Sapanisertib manufacturer with low bone turnover (0.54). A recent analysis in 6,459 osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women in the FIT study [12] concluded that the efficacy of alendronate in reducing non-vertebral

fractures was greater in those with higher baseline bone turnover levels, although there was some inconsistency between different biochemical markers. The vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of alendronate was also influenced by baseline bone turnover in non-osteoporotic women, but no significant influence was found among osteoporotic women [12]. In the case of the bone formation agent, teriparatide, the relative risk reduction for osteoporotic fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral combined) was found to be similar for women in all tertiles of baseline bone turnover markers [14]. However, in that analysis, the risk of fracture increased markedly across tertiles of bone turnover markers, ��-Nicotinamide molecular weight in both the placebo and teriparatide-treated groups. For example, the risks of fracture in the

teriparatide group were 0.03, 0.04 and 0.08 in the low, middle and high tertiles of b-ALP, respectively. Thus, the absolute risk reduction with teriparatide was influenced by baseline bone turnover, and the number needed to treat to prevent one fracture decreased with higher tertiles of bone turnover markers. In the present study, the risk of fracture in the strontium ranelate group was similar across tertiles of baseline b-ALP and sCTX, whereas the fracture risk in women treated with placebo increased. The absolute reduction in fracture risk achieved with strontium Avelestat (AZD9668) ranelate treatment was therefore greater in women with higher pre-treatment bone turnover. In a range of in vitro and in vivo experimental models, strontium ranelate has been shown to simultaneously reduce bone resorption and increase bone formation [18, 36, 37], without any change in bone mineralization [38–40]. Thus, strontium ranelate rebalances bone turnover in favour of bone formation. This effect of strontium ranelate on bone turnover may contribute to its anti-fracture efficacy in women with widely differing bone turnover status. It is increasingly recognised that osteoporosis is a multifactorial disease. BMD is widely used both in diagnosis and fracture risk prediction.