Further evidence also suggests that medial temporal lobe structures are involved. All this leads one to infer that the explicit mind is evolutionarily more recent. This hypothesis is consistent with the view that information processing is hierarchically structured in animals with a highly developed prefrontal cortex. The functional hierarchy

is devoted to exhibiting the most sophisticated ABT-263 research buy knowledge representation and explicit mental abilities in the highest-order prefrontal cortex (Dietrich, 2003). Given that the explicit system is subserved by prefrontal regions, it follows that a flow experience must occur during a state of transient hypofrontality that can bring about

the inhibition of the explicit system. The neural correlates of the implicit system are not so clear. The basal ganglia are implicated in procedural memory (motor and cognitive skills), but contribute also to priming, conditioning, and habituation. Moreover, further mTOR target central evidence is that optimal performance involving a real-time sensorymotor integration task is associated with maximal implicit mental ability of the tasks execution. The neurobiological evidence reported in Dietrich’s extensive review based on electrophysiological data seems to corroborate a reductionist view of CM and UM in TBM. According to Wegner’s point of view FW illusion is a subjective feeling that arises when the agent is convinced that he is doing an intentional action ‘free from causes’ and this feeling is reinforced many times a day. Thus, one may objectively argue that FW illusion is a by-product of the infinite repetition of a paradigm in which the subject is both the agent and the witness of the action. Conversely, a conscious agent can think about his FW as a genuine causal constituent of the action but he is just deceiving himself. Since the idea of possessing FW is a subjective feeling that lags behind the

action, the definition of FW given above cannot hold. Other situations in human behaviour have also been attributed to intrinsic, unavoidable psychological errors. These cases provided the philosophical bases for the formulation of the “error click here theory”. Historically, this theory was introduced primarily to discuss the truth or falsity of moral rules. The principles on which “error theory” can stand, lead to the inference that knowledge requires truth. Thus, if there is no moral truth, there can be no moral knowledge and moral values are purely chimerical (Landau, 2010). The philosophy of “naturalism” sees moral judgments as true and obeying the laws of nature (Kurtz, 2003), while its opponents claim that moral statements are not reducible to natural terms (Landau, 2004).