aeruginosa, only few reports investigated the involvement of rhlG in this biosynthesis pathway. We focused our study on transcriptional regulation. A previous study [4] identified two sigma factors involved in rhlG transcription, σ70 and σ54. Promoter mapping

led us to discover an additional promoter and a third sigma factor involved: AlgU. Since rhlG has been found to be involved in rhamnolipid production [4], ABT-737 and since the authors described a “lux box” potentially recognized by RhlR/C4-HSL, it was suggested that rhlG was regulated similarly as the other genes involved in the rhamnolipid biosynthesis (rhlAB and rhlC). Here we found that it was not the case. Whereas C4-HSL is required for rhlAB transcription [10], we observed that it has a negative eFT-508 datasheet effect on rhlG promoter activity. The “lux box” overlaps the AlgU-dependent promoter (Figure 1) and it is possible

that the binding of RhlR/C4-HSL onto the “lux box” prevents the activity of this promoter. In support of this hypothesis, transcriptional fusions showed that AlgU is the main sigma factor for rhlG transcription during stationary phase (from about 16 h of culture) (Figure 2A and B), when C4-HSL reaches its maximal concentration [17, 18]. We also observed that rhlG promoter activity and mRNA level were increased under hyperosmotic buy SC79 stress conditions. This result is in agreement with the above hypothesis since C4-HSL production is reduced under hyperosmotic stress [18], whereas AlgU activity is induced in this condition [28]. We confirmed that the increase of rhlG promoter activity under hyperosmotic stress was dependent on AlgU but not on σ54. By contrast, rhlAB and rhlC mRNA levels were reported to be lower under STAT inhibitor osmotic stress and rhamnolipid production was abolished [17, 18]. It should be noted that the “lux box” found in rhlG promoter region (Figure 1) does

not match exactly the consensus (the most conserved motif is CT-N12-AG [29], whereas CT and AG are separated by 13 nucleotides upstream of rhlG) and is closely related neither to an rhl-responsive nor to a las-specific binding sequence as defined in [30]. The consequence of such an unusual “lux box” is unknown, but we cannot exclude that this sequence is actually not a RhlR binding site and that RhlR/C4-HSL acts indirectly on rhlG transcription, for example by inducing the expressing of a gene encoding an unknown rhlG repressor. Consistently with the inverse regulation of rhlG and the genes involved in rhamnolipid synthesis, rhamnolipid production was not dramatically impaired in the rhlG null mutant that we constructed in P. aeruginosa PAO1, in agreement with Zhu and Rock [3] data. This raises the question of the RhlG function. RhlG was confirmed to be an NADPH-dependent β-ketoacyl reductase, but its substrates are not carried by the ACP [6].