Statistical guidelines forjudging validity of linkage reports in complex disorders have been suggested.36,40 These guidelines suggest thresholds for an initial report of “significant” linkage (LOD score ≈3.6 or nominal P≈0.00002) and for confirmation (LOD score =1.2 or P≈0.01). These guidelines should limit false positives

to less than 5%. It should be remembered that these guidelines refer to analysis of a single phenotypic definition (eg, BP I and BP II disorders). If multiple (overlapping) phenotypes are analyzed, some statistical adjustments for multiple hypothesis testing may be necessary. An associated critical issue is the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical power of a confirmation study to detect the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical effect size initially described. Effect sizes are often expressed as the increased Venetoclax relative risk41 due to a specific genetic locus.42 This increased relative risk refers to the ratio of the risk to a BP proband’s relative (eg, sibling) to develop the disorder divided by the risk for the general population.

For BP disorder, family studies suggest that the relative risk for siblings is increased by a factor of ≈8 to 9 (see Gershon et al,20 for Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical example). Because BP disorder is almost certainly an oligogenic syndrome, in which at least several loci contribute to Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the increased relative risk, locus-specific relative risk

(the increased risk due to a single locus) is expected to be much less than 9. For complex traits, such as hypertension, diabetes, and BP disorder, loci that increase risk by factors greater than 2 are unusual. One such locus is near the ITLA locus for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (relative risk ≈3),43 another is the apolipoprotein E locus in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease.44 If three loci of equal effect size are used in an interactive Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical multiplicative model to explain the increased relative risk in BP disorder (each locus increases relative risk by ≈2), then these three hypothetical interactive loci explain most of the relative risk (2 × 2 × 2 = 8). Thus, loci that increase risk for BP disorder until will have minor to moderate effects. Substantial sample sizes are required to detect such loci of minor effect. As Hauser and Boehnke45 have shown, ≈400 affected sibling pairs are needed to have >95% power to detect initially (LOD >3) loci which increase risk by a factor of 2, while 200 pairs are needed to have >95% power to provide confirmation (P≤0.01) of a previously detected locus. Review of bipolar molecular linkage studies Molecular methods have been used in BP linkage studies to localize susceptibility genes. A linkage study of Old Order Amish pedigrees described evidence (LOD score >4.