Participants Insurance physicians A total of 100 IPs who assess c

Participants Insurance physicians A total of 100 IPs who assess claimants for long-term disability

benefits were randomly selected from a pool of 566 IPs who work for the Institute for Employee Benefit Schemes (UWV) in the Netherlands. This semi-governmental organization employs all IPs who perform statutory assessments of claimants for long-term disability benefit in the Netherlands. To test the hypothesis that 66% of the IPs conclude that FCE information has a complementary value for the assessment of physical work ability, under the assumption of the H0 hypothesis of 40% (Wind et al. 2006), https://www.selleckchem.com/products/nu7441.html 28 IPs had to be included (α = 0.05, β = 0.8). All participating IPs signed an informed consent form. Claimants Each IP gave information

about the study to a number of MSD claimants who were due to be assessed in the context of long-term disability benefit claims. The information packet included an application form that the claimant could fill out and send directly to the researchers. The claimants could also indicate that they did not wish to participate and explain why (though they were not obliged to give any reason). The first claimant seen by a given IP who agreed to take part in the study underwent an FCE assessment after signing an informed consent form. The claimant received a copy of the FCE report. The Medical

Ethical Committee of the Academic SCH727965 nmr Medical Center, Amsterdam, approved the study. The study period was from November 2005 to February 2007. Procedure Each IP was asked to assess the physical work ability in accordance with the statutory rules for the claimant who had volunteered to participate in the study. After receiving the report of the FCE assessment from the FCE provider, this report Metalloexopeptidase was presented to the IP in combination with his own report in the patient’s file. After reading the FCE report, the IP was requested to fill in a questionnaire in which he gave his opinion of the complementary value of the FCE information and stated whether the information led him to change his initial assessment. The statutory assessment of the claimant for the purposes of the disability benefit claim was based on the IP’s initial judgement, i.e., the FCE information had no influence on this statutory assessment (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 A flow diagram of the study design FCE test The FCE instrument used in this study was the Ergo-Kit. This FCE is comprised of a battery of standardized tests that reflect work-related activities. The standard protocol, Vistusertib mouse containing 55 tests, was performed by certified raters and took approximately three hours to complete.

Comments are closed.