On the Emotion chimeras, participants with a left-holding mother had a significantly larger leftward bias than those with a right-holding mother, F(1, 51) = 19.96, p < .001 (see Table 1 for means and standard deviations per group and sex). There

was no effect of sex (F = 0) and no interaction between sex and holding preference (F = 1.3). On the Gender chimeras, individuals with a left-holding mother again had a significantly larger leftward bias than those with a right-holding mother, F(1, 51) = 19.2, p < .001. The effects of Linsitinib mouse sex (F = .03) and the interaction between sex and feeding posture (F = 1.4) were again not significant Because of the absence of an effect of sex, further data analyses were carried out with independent t-tests (one-tailed). To explore the source of the diminished left-bias average for right-held individuals, we inspected the individual bias scores more closely. All participants with a left-holding mother (n = 25) had a leftward bias with both Emotion and Gender chimeras. Most of the participants with a right-holding mother (n = 30) also turned out to have a leftward bias with Emotion (n = 25) and Gender chimeras (n = 26), but reduced and (still) significantly different from the leftward participants (Emotion: left-held: M = −.313; SD = .163; right-held: M = −.179; SD = .097; t(48) = 3.55, p < .001; Gender: left-held: M = −.402;

SD = .111; right-held: this website Amrubicin M = −.266; SD = .149). Some of the right-held participants had a rightward or no bias (Emotion: four participants had a rightward bias, one no bias; Gender: two participants had a rightward bias, two no bias). A significant leftward bias for face chimeras (emotion and gender) was found for both the left-held and the right-held participant group. The leftward bias for face chimeras replicates earlier findings thereof (e.g. Levy et al., 1983, Luh et al., 1991 and Rueckert, 2005). Female and male participants had similar left-biases, as is consistent with some

(e.g. Levy et al., 1983 and Rueckert, 2005) but not all (Bourne, 2005) earlier studies. More importantly, we found evidence for a reduced leftward bias for face chimeras in individuals who as an infant had been right-held as opposed to left-held by their mothers. This effect was not specific for the perception of emotion since the same bias was also found for the perception of gender. As a result we suggest that side of holding affects face perception in general. Of course the quality of the stimuli might have affected our results. Note, however, that researchers using different kind of stimuli (printed photo’s, photo’s on computer monitor, cartoons, stimuli with and without clear transitions between the two face halves) found the same kind of results. The direction and size of the difference between emotion and gender chimeras in the present study was in line with the results of Burt and Perrett (1997) and Butler et al.