Nevertheless, AHS is a potentially fatal condition

which

Nevertheless, AHS is a potentially fatal condition

which may be preventable. Although the positive predictive value of HLA-B*5801 is low, the test may be useful in patients with Asian ethnic background. Since other hypo-uricemic drugs such as probenecid and febuxostat are available, patients may not wish to take the risk (albeit small) of a serious drug reaction to allopurinol. The option of having this test (on a self-financed basis) should be made available MG-132 clinical trial to patients if routine screening has not been or cannot be implemented. However, it should be stressed that having the HLA-B*5801 test does not result in absolutely no risk of allopurinol-related SJS/TEN. Monitoring for signs and symptoms is still necessary. Other mitigating factors include only prescribing allopurinol for treatment of hyper-uricemia in symptomatic conditions such as gout, urate nephrolithiasis and nephropathy and when cytolytic therapy is considered. Recently, a study by Stamp[21] has shown that the starting dose of allopurinol is an important risk factor for development of AHS. The study suggests a starting dose of 1.5 mg

per unit of estimated glomerular filtration rate, with progressive up-titration of the dose to achieve the target serum uric acid level. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*5801 testing in a population setting should be carried out. This may lead to the development of guidelines which can assist prescribing physicians and ensure that a uniform approach is

adopted when the question about genotype Avasimibe ic50 testing arises in clinical practice. “
“Aim:  Prompted by a clinical question, we critically appraised a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. Methods:  Systemic reviews and a meta-analysis are introduced to the reader Resveratrol in the perspective of a clinical scenario that raises questions about applicability of certain treatment options in clinical practice. Critical appraisal of meta-analysis addresses three questions. (i) What are the results? (ii) Are the results valid? (iii) How can I apply the results to my patient care? Results:  A meta-analysis paper titled ‘Mycophenolate mofetil is as efficacious as, but safer than, cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression’by Mak et al. (2009) was selected. Our critical appraisal identified several strengths of the paper, such as having a clearly focused clinical question, considering clinically important outcomes, using appropriate inclusion criteria to select primary studies, assessing quality of selected papers, good reproducibility in the assessment of primary studies and performing sensitivity analysis and meta-regression to account for heterogeneity.

Comments are closed.