CrossRef 47 Pärna R, Joost U, Nõmmiste E, Käämbre T, Kikas A, Ku

CrossRef 47. Pärna R, Joost U, Nõmmiste E, Käämbre T, Kikas A, Kuusik I, Hirsimäki M, Kink I, Kisand www.selleckchem.com/products/jq-ez-05-jqez5.html V: Effect of cobalt doping and annealing on properties of titania thin films prepared by sol–gel process. Appl Surf Sci 2011, 257:6897–6907.CrossRef 48. Hong NH, Sakai J, Prellier W: Distribution of dopant in Fe:TiO 2 and Ni:TiO 2 thin films.

J Mag Mag Mater 2004, 281:347–352.CrossRef 49. Hong NH: Ferromagnetism in transition-metal-doped semiconducting oxide thin films. J Mag Mag Mater 2006, 303:338–343.CrossRef 50. Cabrera AF, Errico L, Rodríguez Torres CE, Sánchez FH: Influence of thermal treatments on phase formation and magnetic behaviour in metal transition doped TiO 2 . Physica B 2007, 389:103–106.CrossRef 51. Park YR, Choi S-l, Lee JH, Kim KJ: Ferromagnetic

properties of Ni-doped rutile Luminespib TiO 2 . J Korean Phys Soc 2007, 50:638–642.CrossRef 52. Jiang YB, Mi WB, Jiang EY, Bai HL: Structure, optical, and magnetic properties of facing-target reactive sputtered Ti 1−x Fe x O 2−δ films. J Vac Sci Technol A 2009, 27:1172–1177.CrossRef 53. Yagi E, Hasiguti RR, Aono M: Electronic conduction above 4 K of slightly reduced oxygen-deficient rutile TiO 2-x . Phys Rev B 1996, 54:7945–7956.CrossRef 54. Tang H, Prasad K, Sanjines R, Schmid PE, Levy F: Electrical and optical properties of TiO 2 anatase thin films. J Appl Phys 1994, 75:2042–2047.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions JT carried out the preparation of sol–gel, participated in the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. HG carried out the tackling SE and modified the manuscript. HK participated in the Unoprostone preparation of the samples. PY participated in the design of the study and performed the data analysis. JC and

WZ conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Pseudocapacitors, based on reversible redox reactions at/near the surface of the electrode, represent one type of supercapacitors having the potential for high energy densities [1–3]. As is known, the excellent electrode should primarily meet the following key requirements: (1) a large number of electroactive sites, (2) high transport rates of both electrolyte ions and electrons, and (3) high electronic conductivity [4]. Among various pseudocapacitor electrode materials, RuO2 has been extensively studied because of its ultrahigh theoretical capacitance (2,000 F · g-1 in a wide potential window of 1.4 V), a nearly metallic electrical conductivity and excellent chemical stability [5]. However, RuO2 has the drawbacks of high cost and toxicity. Therefore, extensive efforts have been made to search for alternative materials, such as Ni, Co, or Mn-based oxides/hydroxides [6–9]. Because the energy density of a supercapacitor is proportional to the square of the cell voltage, the energy density of Ni- and Co-related materials is limited by the narrow potential window [10].

Comments are closed.